2021 Concrete Canoe
Northern Arizona University
i | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 FOCUS AREAS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 SUMMARY OF VALUE ADDED ............................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SIMPLIFIED MIX DESIGN ....................................................................................................................... 2
4.0 MENTEE PROGRAM................................................................................................................................. 3
5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 7
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Utelite (left) and expanded Perlite (right) used as the sole aggregates ................................................... 2
Figure 2: 8mm PVA Fibers ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3: MasterFiber MAC Matrix Fibers ............................................................................................................ 3
Figure 4: Flow of Knowledge ................................................................................................................................. 4
Figure 5: Mentees watching and learning how a slump test is performed .............................................................. 5
Figure 6: Mentees making concrete cylinders for the mix design testing .............................................................. 6
Figure 7: Mentees hand-mixing concrete ............................................................................................................... 6
TABLE OF TABLES
Table 1 Decision Matrix ......................................................................................................................................... 1
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
1 | P a g e
1.0 FOCUS AREAS SELECTION PROCESS
The Northern Arizona University Ponderosa Canoe team started with six possible enhanced focus areas:
construction of a full-scale canoe, construction of scaled-down canoe, extensive laboratory materials testing,
improvements to the current mentee program, simplification of a complex mix design, and construction
techniques. To narrow down the selection process and choose the final two enhanced focus areas, the team utilized
a decision matrix. Within the decision matrix, the criteria that held weight for the decision were innovation (25%),
sustainability (20%), cost (20%), number of people necessary (15%), material availability (10%), and overall
theme (10%). The decision matrix can be seen below as Table 1.
Table 1 Decision Matrix
Enhanced Focus Areas: Decision Matrix
Criteria Innovation Sustainability Cost
# People
Necessary
Material
Availability
Overall
Theme
Total
Score
Alternatives Weight 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.1 100%
Construction of
Full-Scale Canoe
Raw Score
6
2
1
3
5
8
3.85
Weighted
1.5
0.4
0.2
0.45
0.5
0.8
Scaled Down
Canoe
Raw Score
5
4
6
6
7
8
5.65
Weighted
1.25
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.8
Laboratory
Materials Testing
Raw Score
3
6
7
7
7
1
5.2
Weighte
d
0.75
1.2
1.4
1.05
0.7
0.1
Simplification of
a complex mix
Raw Score
9
6
8
4
7
3
6.65
Weighted
2.25
1.2
1.6
0.6
0.7
0.3
Mentee Program
Raw Score
8
7
9
3
5
1
6.25
Weighte
d
2
1.
4
1.
8
0
.45
0.
0.
1
Construction
Techniques
Raw Score
8
5
4
4
6
1
5.1
Weighted
2
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.1
The team decided that innovation should hold the highest weight out of the possible criteria because
innovation is the reason for this competition and the greatest challenge posed from the Request for Proposals
(RFP) every year. Sustainability is always an important criterion for NAU teams, especially because the
University prides itself on sustainability, being nestled in the beautiful Ponderosa Pine Forest of Northern
Arizona. Cost was one of the most important criteria because NAU canoe teams are always responsible for raising
their own funds and the team recognized that fundraising may be more difficult with COVID-19. Number of
people necessary was the next highest weight with COVID restrictions allowing a maximum of 10 people for
gatherings, the team recognized that some of the possible focus areas may be difficult to complete with only that
number of people. Finally, the lowest two weighted criteria were material availability and overall theme. Material
availability refers to location of materials relative to Flagstaff along with the market costs of these materials. The
overall theme of our project this year is Ponderosa, which focuses on the beautiful Ponderosa Pine forest that the
team is surrounded by every day.
The final two enhanced focus areas that were chosen through the decision matrix were a simplification of a
complex mix as well as the development of NAU’s mentee program. Their final weighted scores from the matrix
were 6.65 and 6.25, respectively. Although the team would have loved to construct either a full-scale or scaled-
down canoe, the options just did not provide strength in the sustainability, cost, or number of people necessary
criteria. As can be seen in Table 1 above, both the simplified mix design and the mentee program scored high in
innovation, sustainability, cost, number of people necessary to be together at once, and material availability.
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
2 | P a g e
2.0 SUMMARY OF VALUE ADDED
The two enhanced focus areas selected by the team added very different values to the project. The first,
simplified mix design, added a technical value to the design of the final product. The second, improved mentee
program, added a project management and inclusion value to the overall project.
Focusing on a simplified mix design improved the current relations between NAU’s ASCE chapter and local
suppliers. The team members were constantly in contact with local suppliers in an attempt to only use locally
sourced materials. This enhanced focus area also forced the team to experiment with materials that may not be
used very often. This was an unexpected task as all of the knowledge needed for use of these materials had to be
found from sources other than past NAU canoe teams. This strengthened the team’s understanding of concrete
mixes as well as the understanding of different aggregates or admixtures.
Focusing time and attention to the mentee program improved the efficiency and innovation of the overall
project more than the team had originally anticipated. As expected, inclusion of more people allowed for more
testing and design to be completed in a short amount of time, increasing the project’s efficiency. But an
inadvertent result of focusing on the mentee program was an added element of fresh knowledge and innovative
ideas to the design process. Possibly the greatest value the mentee involvement added to the project was that the
captains were challenged each and every day to ensure that they understood the technical content enough to teach
someone else. It is often said that the best way to learn is to teach. This is relevant and applicable to the experiences
the captains had throughout the training and inclusion of the team’s mentees.
3.0 SIMPLIFIED MIX DESIGN
The goal of our simplified mix design is to use locally sourced materials and to create a mix with as few
components as necessary. It is common for NAU canoe teams to procure materials from all over the nation, which
can become costly if the canoe prototype is chosen to go into production on a larger scale. Also, if too many
materials are to go into a mix it could complicate production more by allowing for more possibility of a “choke”
in the supply chain. Local materials are also cheaper to haul and get delivered in large quantities.
The team approached acquiring local materials by contacting companies in Arizona and catering the mix to
using those materials. To do this, a new approach to mix design was utilized. This approach differs from the
common approach of NAU canoe teams where they would create a list of mixes and then go back and choose the
most favorable one. This year, each mix was an improvement upon the last by changing one component/aspect at
a time to better hone the mix to be simple and local. In the final mix, the team was successful in designing a mix
with every component in it available in Arizona except for Utelite, which is produced in Utah—a close neighbor
to Arizona.
Figure 1: Utelite (left) and expanded Perlite (right) used as the sole aggregates
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
3 | P a g e
The team slowly removed components one at a time that were deemed extra and unnecessary to the team’s
goals. An example of this is the removal of an air entrainer admixture, which was originally implemented to
reduce the weight of the mix. After a trial was done, the air entrainer admixture was found to have minimal impact
on the weight of the mix, but a negative impact on its strength. Thus, it was more appropriate to remove it. Another
example the replacement of an aggregate, Ultralightweight-Foamed Glass Aggregate (UL-FGA), which was
completely replaced following the addition of expanded Perlite into the mix. Perlite is lighter than the UL-FGA
and is a naturally occurring material generally used in horticulture and insulating concrete. Also, the only suppliers
for UL-FGA that were found are located on the other side of the nation.
The mix was simplified over a total of 13 mixes, each one being improved after the other. Overall, only about
4 admixtures were used along with two aggregates, two cementitious materials, and 8mm fibers. These simple
components formed to create a composite that has a plastic density of 93 pcf and a compressive strength of 2250
psi. The use of one type of fiber, and that a short type of fiber, was enough to provide the concrete a tensile
strength of 333 psi. This is about twice the strength of previous NAU teams who used a combination of two fibers
or more [1]. To obtain the results for the compression and tensile strengths ASTM C39 & ASTM C496 testing
procedures were followed [2] [3]. Along with the ASTM testing methods, the NAU materials lab was utilized
along with the compression machine. Figures 1 and 2 below show the two main types of fibers that have been
used by NAU concrete canoe teams in recent years. The image on the right shows the fibers used by the NAU
2019 Volcanoe team while the image on the left shows the fibers used this year by the Ponderosa team. The fibers
used this year were easier to work with and helped improve the mix while not sacrificing the simplicity of the
mix.
These mixes were conducted by the team with the help of mentees. Part of the reason for conducting mixes
this year and trying to refine them was to better transfer the knowledge of mix design to future teams. These were
also a good team exercise so all team members could become efficient in the ins-and-outs of mix design and learn
to collaborate with each other. The help of the mentees and the importance of having them involved can be seen
in the next section.
4.0 MENTEE PROGRAM
This year’s team set a goal to improve Northern Arizona University’s concrete canoe mentee program. At
NAU, a mentee is a student that is interested in being involved with the project but is not yet a team lead. This
experience prepares the mentee's for the rigorous project that is concrete canoe. The current team leads have all
been a part of the mentee program in previous years. A trend that the team noticed was the deterioration of the
Figure 3: MasterFiber MAC Matrix Fibers
Figure 2: 8mm PVA Fibers
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
4 | P a g e
mentee program throughout the past four years. Each year, there were less mentees involved in events such as
mix design and testing. This trend of decreasing mentee involvement was noticed when looking at past teams’
presentations and pictures. It could clearly be seen that a few years ago there was a large group of mentees
involved in work like the canoe construction as well as weekly mixes. As the years went on, less and less mentees
were seen involved in the technical work. Understanding the great commitment required to construct a full-scale
canoe, it was decided that sustaining and developing the mentee program was crucial to the success of the concrete
canoe program at NAU. The team recognized that COVID would pose many issues, so it was decided that the
more options for manpower available, meant the team may be able to continue its work even with one or a couple
of team members going into forced isolation. Improving the mentee program will not only benefit this year’s team
but will benefit future concrete canoe teams.
The premise of the mentee program as an enhanced focus area was to challenge this year’s project
management skills and inclusion. To complete this goal, this year’s team began by recruiting underclassmen in
the ASCE student chapter that showed interest in the project. The opportunity was also opened up to students not
yet involved in NAU ASCE through the general engineering department’s email list. This way, students who may
be interested in the program but are unsure how to get involved, had the opportunity as well. The team captains
took the responsibility of reaching out to each student separately to ensure they felt welcomed to the team. From
there, every mentee was invited to work with the team captains on technical work such as mix design and testing,
hull design, and structural design. It was not a requirement that mentees be in-person during these technical events.
A virtual option was always made available in the case that a mentee did not feel comfortable attending an in-
person event but still wished to be involved on the project. This virtual option included an ongoing Zoom session
during mix design testing that virtual mentees could join if unable to be in-person. Then as well as allowing
mentees to join during our weekly team meetings. Not only did mentee involvement increase the efficiency of
our project but also added brainpower to our designs. Including students that have not been involved in concrete
canoe before allowed for input from an outside source along with questions that may not have been brought to
the captain’s attention otherwise. Figure 4 below shows the visual representation of the flow of information
between the core team, mentees, and future canoe teams.
Although the value added through mentee involvement is difficult to quantify, there are a few numbers worthy
of recognizing. The core team was composed of 5 team leads. Each of these team leads had a specific
responsibility to the project whether that was mix design, hull design, etc. By opening up the team to other
engineering students, the team increased from 5 students to 9 students. This meant an 80% increase of members
that would not have been involved without the mentee program. This addition of members was a large help with
respect to the technical work performed as there were more people to help complete the work. Having
underclassmen mentees was also helpful because they may see things from an untrained or fresh mind which
could help the team leads to recognize components of the project that could be improved or just wouldn’t have
worked. The mentee involvement forced this year’s team to act as teachers and explain every aspect of the
technical work and theories. This form of teaching and learning can be seen in Figures 5, 6, & 7 below.
Figure 4: Flow of Knowledge
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
5 | P a g e
Figure 5: Mentees watching and learning how a slump test is performed
A large part of mix design was performing standardized tests following the ASTM standards. Figure 5,
seen above, shows this year’s mix design lead explaining the slump test to two mentees using the standard test
method ASTM C143 [4]. The slump test is an important method of measuring the workability of mix design and
explaining the test to new members will help future teams better understand underlying concepts. Figure 6, seen
below, shows this years’ mentees learning to fill and properly consolidate a cylinder in accordance with the
standard test method ASTM C31 [5]. The mentees were a big help in testing, mixing concrete, construction
testing, and other tasks that required an extra hand. This is a great source of experience for the mentees as they
are not just merely watching the work performed but rather doing some of the work themselves and gaining
technical knowledge from it.
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
6 | P a g e
Figure 6: Mentees making concrete cylinders for the mix design testing
Figure 7 shows the mentees mixing concrete and learning about the different components that go into
making a concrete mix. The mentees were able to see and feel the differences in the mix as components were
added. As the process went on, the mentees began to identify and understand when something was visibly off
about the mix. This showed the team leads that a learning process was taking shape. The physical contact and
mixing of the concrete helped bridge concept and reality—the mentees were able to see the physical changes
happen before their eyes. The learning experiences that took place with the mentees were key to the success of
this enhanced focus area. Throughout the mentee program there was a sense of pride and community that
flourished. Working on new ideas with team-lead-to-mentee collaboration created a successful learning
environment. The work completed for the project and value added to the project by the mentees proved to be
successful this year. By working hard to ensure that the mentees were included whenever possible, the wisdom
that they have gained will help them in their future concrete canoe endeavors.
Figure 7: Mentees hand-mixing concrete
PONDEROSA | ENHANCED FOCUS AREAS REPORT
7 | P a g e
5.0 REFERENCES
[1] Northern Arizona University. (2020). Agassiz. NCCC Design Paper. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.
[2] ASTM Standard C39, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete
Specimens”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, DOI: 10.1520/C039, www.astm.org
[3] ASTM Standard C496, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete
Specimens”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, DOI: 10.1520/C0496, www.astm.org
[4] ASTM Standard C143, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete”, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, DOI: 10.1520/C0143, www.astm.org
[5] ASTM Standard C31, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field”,
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, DOI: 10.1520/C031, www.astm.org
PONDEROSA | BACK COVER